Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

3.6k papers and 48.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols in the last decades have received a total of 48.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols usually cover Molecular Biology (2.3k papers), Genetics (719 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (460 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (281 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (254 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols are Joseph Sambrook, David W. Russell, Brad Chazotte, Michael R. Green, Matthias Meyer, Martin Kircher, David W. Mount, Marie‐Paule Lefranc, Donald C. Rio and Timothy W. Nilsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols.

Countries where authors publish in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cold Spring Harbor Protocols more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025