Michael Poole

32 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Michael Poole
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Public Administration 58
  • Otorhinolaryngology 29
  • Rehabilitation 26
  • Genetics 103
  • Surgery 152
Replace Margaret Anne Johnson with:
Margaret Anne Johnson United Kingdom
Femke de Vries Netherlands
Richard McIntyre United States
Jerome L. Murphy United States
Johann Fuchs Germany
Michael C. Webb United States
Imtiaz Bashir Pakistan
William T. Daniel United States
James Pemberton United Kingdom
Taru Lehtonen Finland
Michael Poole relative to Margaret Anne Johnson United Kingdom Margaret Anne Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17.2×
Margaret Anne Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Poole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Poole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Poole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Poole. The network helps show where Michael Poole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Poole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Poole Line = papers co-authored together Michael Poole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200680
2 198943
3 197742
4 197735
5 200635
6 200234
7 200125
8 199725
9 199118
10 198417
11 199917
12 199212
13 197911
14 20049
15 20077
16 20057
17 19766
18 20094
19 20074
20 19993

About Michael Poole

Michael Poole is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Transplantation, Internal Medicine and Public Administration, having authored 34 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (4 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers) and Historical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (58 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (29 citations), Rehabilitation (26 citations), Genetics (103 citations) and Surgery (152 citations). Michael Poole has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Willman, Vahram Y. Bakamjian, William Gomberg, Kim G. Johnson, Mark Peter Gianoutsos, Frank Joseph Martin, Neil A. Rowe, Robert W. Lindeman, Michael F. Buckley and Duncan S. MacKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Otolaryngology and Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact