Current Gene Therapy

978 papers and 25.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 978 papers published in Current Gene Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 25.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Gene Therapy usually cover Molecular Biology (630 papers), Genetics (460 papers) and Biotechnology (105 papers) specifically the topics of Virus-based gene therapy research (415 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (241 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Gene Therapy are Thomas J. McCown, William S.M. Wold, Károly Tóth, Federico Mingozzi, James M. Wilson, Luk H. Vandenberghe, Philippe Duchâteau, Frédéric Pâques, Liliane Tenenbaum and Katherine A. High.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Gene Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Gene Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Gene Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Current Gene Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Gene Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Gene Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Gene Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025