Countries where authors publish in Current Gene Therapy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Gene Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Gene Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Gene Therapy more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Gene Therapy
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Gene Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Gene Therapy.
About Current Gene Therapy
The 1.0k papers published in Current Gene Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Gene Therapy usually cover Genetics (437 papers), Biotechnology (100 papers), Molecular Biology (583 papers), Oncology (95 papers) and Cancer Research (52 papers) specifically the topics of Virus-based gene therapy research (400 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (225 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (192 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (96 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (68 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (65 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (55 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Gene Therapy are Federico Mingozzi, William S.M. Wold, Károly Tóth, Katherine A. High, Thomas J. McCown, Luk H. Vandenberghe, James M. Wilson, Liliane Tenenbaum, Philippe Duchâteau and Frédéric Pâques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.