Michael P. Tuite

26 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Michael P. Tuite
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Sensory Systems 88
  • Geometry and Topology 128
  • Algebra and Number Theory 65
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
Replace Luca Mazzucato with:
Luca Mazzucato United States
Patrick Desrosiers Canada
Masahide Kato Japan
Corey Jones United States
Anthony Bak Germany
Houman Safaai Italy
Juhan Aru Switzerland
Roberta Fabbri Italy
Lei Niu China
V. Matveev United States
Michael P. Tuite relative to Luca Mazzucato United States Luca Mazzucato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Luca Mazzucato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. Tuite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. Tuite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. Tuite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. Tuite more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. Tuite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. Tuite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. Tuite. The network helps show where Michael P. Tuite may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael P. Tuite, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael P. Tuite Line = papers co-authored together Michael P. Tuite links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981176
2
Torus n-Point Functions for $mathbb{R}$-graded Vertex Operator Superalgebras and Continuous Fermion Orbifolds
201222
3 199522
4 199219
5 198216
6 200314
7 198913
8 201011
9 201111
10 201010
11 20118
12
On Genus Two Riemann Surfaces Formed from Sewn Tori
20127
13 20105
14 20024
15 19874
16 20203
17 20032
18 19872
19 19822
20 19822

About Michael P. Tuite

Michael P. Tuite is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (16 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (88 citations), Geometry and Topology (128 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (65 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (17 citations). Michael P. Tuite has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. E. Leonard, Geoffrey Mason, János Balog, A. D. Martin, F. Halzen, Donia Scott, Martin Lavelle, Rossen I. Ivanov, B. Lautrup and A. Vladikas. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, The European Physical Journal C, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical and International Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact