Michael Osborn

55 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Michael Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Hematology 267
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 387
  • Genetics 194
  • Speech and Hearing 73
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 221
Replace Robert C. Trueworthy with:
Robert C. Trueworthy United States
Robison Ll United States
Mary J. Waskerwitz United States
Clare Frobisher United Kingdom
Caroline A. Hastings United States
Marcia Leonard United States
Lindsey Hageman United States
Jennifer L. McNeer United States
Lisa Orme Australia
Keiko Asami Japan
Michael Osborn relative to Robert C. Trueworthy United States Robert C. Trueworthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48.5×
Robert C. Trueworthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Osborn. The network helps show where Michael Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Osborn Line = papers co-authored together Michael Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010141
2 201978
3 201657
4 201349
5 201842
6 201740
7 202134
8 202134
9
Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: a randomised trial.
199627
10 201524
11 201123
12 201723
13 201823
14 201822
15 201621
16 202120
17 202119
18 202019
19 201819
20 201218

About Michael Osborn

Michael Osborn is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hematology, Genetics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (22 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (17 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (15 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (9 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (267 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (387 citations), Genetics (194 citations), Speech and Hearing (73 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (221 citations). Michael Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. White, Timothy P. Hughes, Antoinette Anazodo, Kate Thompson, Lisa Orme, Verity A Saunders, Amity Frede, David T Yeung, Phuong Dang and Stephanie Zrim. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Cancers, Pediatric Blood & Cancer and British Journal of Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact