Pediatric Blood & Cancer

7.9k papers and 155.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.9k papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer in the last decades have received a total of 155.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.6k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.9k papers) and Hematology (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2.1k papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (1.5k papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (958 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pediatric Blood & Cancer are Kenneth L. McClain, Ronald D. Barr, Jan‐Inge Henter, Gritta Janka, David Webb, Melissa M. Hudson, Shinsaku Imashuku, Stephan Ladisch, R. Maarten Egeler and Douglas S. Hawkins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer.

Countries where authors publish in Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pediatric Blood & Cancer more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025