Michael Naylor

35 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Michael Naylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Gender Studies 108
  • Marketing 59
  • Sociology and Political Science 161
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 13
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Janet C. Harris with:
Janet C. Harris United States
Jeffrey Diebold United States
Phillip Vannini Canada
Susan Crotty United States
William Fox United States
Stéphane Joly France
Kelly L. Reddy-Best United States
Janice Forsyth Canada
Harry Edwards United States
Michael L. Butterworth United States
Michael Naylor relative to Janet C. Harris United States Janet C. Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Janet C. Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Naylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Naylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Naylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Naylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Naylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Naylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Naylor. The network helps show where Michael Naylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Naylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Naylor Line = papers co-authored together Michael Naylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201856
2 202136
3 201430
4 200217
5 201714
6 201911
7 201911
8 202011
9 200210
10 20218
11 20217
12 20206
13 19996
14 20126
15 20235
16 20194
17 20234
18 20094
19 20234
20 20144

About Michael Naylor

Michael Naylor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (16 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (16 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (6 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (4 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (108 citations), Marketing (59 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (13 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Michael Naylor has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Geoff Dickson, David P. Hedlund, Rui Biscaia, Oliver W.A. Wilson, Simon Walters, Jeffrey James, Timothy Kellison, Mark E. Havitz, C. Clarke and Brian S. Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Management Review, European Sport Management Quarterly, International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics and British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact