Michael Mowat

51 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Michael Mowat
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Oncology 1.1k
  • Biotechnology 280
  • Genetics 220
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
  • Cancer Research 265
Replace S J Ullrich with:
S J Ullrich United States
J I Johnson United States
Gretchen S. Jimenez United States
Rosaria Orlandi Italy
Jo Milner United Kingdom
Giovanni Esposito Italy
Rachael E. Hawtin United States
Wijnand Helfrich Netherlands
Jerald J. Killion United States
Daitoku Sakamuro United States
Michael Mowat relative to S J Ullrich United States S J Ullrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
S J Ullrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Mowat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Mowat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Mowat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Mowat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Mowat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Mowat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Mowat. The network helps show where Michael Mowat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Mowat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Mowat Line = papers co-authored together Michael Mowat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985294
2
Evidence for a second cell cycle block at G2/M by p53.
1995267
3 1981174
4 1997128
5 1997126
6 1991105
7 198789
8 200075
9 200174
10 199870
11 199669
12 199765
13 198764
14 199562
15 198861
16 199160
17
Evidence for synergistic interactions between ras, myc and a mutant form of p53 in cellular transformation and tumor dissemination.
199242
18 199241
19
Chlorambucil induced apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and its relationship to clinical efficacy.
199439
20 199035

About Michael Mowat

Michael Mowat is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Genetics, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (16 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (10 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.1k citations), Biotechnology (280 citations), Genetics (220 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations) and Cancer Research (265 citations). Michael Mowat has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Benchimol, Geoffrey G. Hicks, Alan Bernstein, Asher Begleiter, F. Paraskevas, Nancy Stewart, Nobuhiro Kimura, P. J. Hastings, R. C. von Borstel and Witold J. Jachymczyk. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Virology, Leukemia Research, Cell Death Discovery and Cell Death and Differentiation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact