William Halliday

116 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

William Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Virology 411
  • Biophysics 319
  • Neurology 446
  • Neurology 765
  • Genetics 509
Replace Yoav Sherman with:
Yoav Sherman Israel
Hang Yin China
Alberto Albertini Italy
Herbert J. Meiselman United States
John F. Engelhardt United States
Shmuel A. Ben‐Sasson Israel
William H. Yong United States
Kazuo Nagashima Japan
George Stoica United States
Hong Ma China
William Halliday relative to Yoav Sherman Israel Yoav Sherman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Yoav Sherman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Halliday. The network helps show where William Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Halliday Line = papers co-authored together William Halliday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998479
2 1995370
3 2004252
4 2008229
5 1994185
6 1996177
7 2004139
8
West Nile virus infection in 2002: morbidity and mortality among patients admitted to hospital in southcentral Ontario.
2003134
9 200793
10 198891
11 201089
12 198480
13 200979
14 199479
15 201077
16 200072
17 199668
18 199365
19
Hallervorden-Spatz disease: MR and pathologic findings.
199363
20 201959

About William Halliday

William Halliday is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Neurology, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 120 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (12 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (9 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (9 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (7 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (7 papers) and Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (411 citations), Biophysics (319 citations), Neurology (446 citations), Neurology (765 citations) and Genetics (509 citations). William Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Henry H. Mantsch, Lin-P'ing Choo, Michael Jackson, B. K. Kleinschmidt‐DeMasters, Christopher M. Filley, Christopher Power, Annette C. Kuesel, Peter H. Watson, Garnette R. Sutherland and Ian C. P. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, Journal of neurosurgery and Annals of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact