Michael McLeish

34 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Michael McLeish
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Endocrinology 110
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 282
  • Insect Science 147
  • Plant Science 384
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 105
Replace Matthew T. Kasson with:
Matthew T. Kasson United States
Robyn Howitt New Zealand
Wen‐Bin Yeh Taiwan
Schyler O. Nunziata United States
Tracy S. Feldman United States
Hans‐Werner Herrmann United States
Karl A. Suiter United States
Brian G. Rector United States
Blanche Christine Bitner Mathe Brazil
Mariusz Lewandowski Poland
Michael McLeish relative to Matthew T. Kasson United States Matthew T. Kasson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Matthew T. Kasson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael McLeish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael McLeish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael McLeish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael McLeish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael McLeish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael McLeish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael McLeish. The network helps show where Michael McLeish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael McLeish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael McLeish Line = papers co-authored together Michael McLeish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201285
2 201960
3 200760
4
Sneaky African fig wasps that oviposit through holes drilled by other species
200936
5 201736
6 201832
7 202026
8 201726
9 200725
10 200621
11 201820
12 201019
13 201019
14 202017
15 200316
16 201915
17 200615
18 201215
19 201113
20 202311

About Michael McLeish

Michael McLeish is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Endocrinology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (16 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (15 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (9 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (6 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (110 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (282 citations), Insect Science (147 citations), Plant Science (384 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (105 citations). Michael McLeish has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fernando García‐Arenal, S. van Noort, Aurora Fraile, Thomas W. Chapman, Michael P. Schwarz, Tom W. Chapman, Bernard J. Crespi, Krystal A. Tolley, Soledad Sacristán and Israel Pagán. Their work appears in journals such as Phytopathology, BMC Evolutionary Biology, New Phytologist, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Virus Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact