James Hereward

949 citations
65 papers · 650 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Hereward

61 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

James Hereward
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Insect Science 406
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 213
  • Plant Science 317
  • Genetics 114
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 47
Replace Meng Ling with:
Meng Ling China
Todd A. Ugine United States
S. Kristine Braman United States
Michelle T. Fountain United Kingdom
Anjel M. Helms United States
Martine Kos Netherlands
J. F. Silvain France
Pedro Henrique Brum Togni Brazil
Janet J. Knodel United States
James Hereward relative to Meng Ling China Meng Ling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Meng Ling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hereward

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hereward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hereward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hereward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hereward

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hereward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hereward. The network helps show where James Hereward may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Hereward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hereward Line = papers co-authored together James Hereward links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011105
2 201668
3 202034
4 201232
5 201429
6 201324
7 201524
8 201722
9 201320
10 202116
11 202116
12 201816
13 201714
14 201812
15 201311
16 201911
17 201311
18 202210
19 201710
20 20189

About James Hereward

James Hereward is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (24 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (10 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (406 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (213 citations), Plant Science (317 citations), Genetics (114 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (47 citations). James Hereward has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gimme H. Walter, A. W. Ridley, Gregory J. Daglish, S. Raghu, Patrick J. Collins, Graham A. McCulloch, Michael J. Furlong, Jeff Werth, Rehan Silva and David Thornby. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Bulletin of Entomological Research, Journal of Economic Entomology, Evolutionary Applications and Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact