Daniel Whitmore

919 citations
43 papers · 348 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Whitmore

41 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Daniel Whitmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Insect Science 289
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 217
  • Ecology 71
  • Genetics 55
  • Ecological Modeling 8
Replace Gregory A. Dahlem with:
Gregory A. Dahlem United States
Meenakshi Bharti India
Kittikhun Moophayak Thailand
Bekka S. Brodie United States
Carlos Henrique Marchiori Brazil
W. G. Vogt Australia
Kirstin A. Williams South Africa
Miroslav Barták Czechia
Shiuh‐Feng Shiao Taiwan
Luisa M. Díaz‐Aranda Spain
Daniel Whitmore relative to Gregory A. Dahlem United States Gregory A. Dahlem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Gregory A. Dahlem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Whitmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Whitmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Whitmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Whitmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Whitmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Whitmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Whitmore. The network helps show where Daniel Whitmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Whitmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Whitmore Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Whitmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201338
2 201629
3 201122
4 201121
5 202120
6 201617
7
Biodiversity of Marganai and Montimannu (Sardinia). Research in the framework of the ICP forests network.
201116
8 201515
9 200913
10 201712
11 201511
12 202410
13 201710
14 201810
15 20249
16 20199
17 20168
18 20147
19 20137
20 20246

About Daniel Whitmore

Daniel Whitmore is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics and Small Animals, having authored 43 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (26 papers), Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (21 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (21 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (3 papers) and Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (289 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (217 citations), Ecology (71 citations), Genetics (55 citations) and Ecological Modeling (8 citations). Daniel Whitmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Pape, Pierfilippo Cerretti, Eliana Buenaventura, Marilena Leis, Milvia Chicca, Marco Pezzi, Adrian C. Pont, Neal L. Evenhuis, Damiano Gianelle and Sönke Hardersen. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Insect Conservation and Diversity, Journal of Medical Entomology and BioControl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact