Daniel Ebert

2.2k citations
22 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Ebert

21 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 490
  • Genetics 415
  • Plant Science 462
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 147
  • Ecological Modeling 46
Replace Kevin Livingstone with:
Kevin Livingstone United States
Marco Cosimo Simeone Italy
Joseph F. Walker United States
Jacob B. Landis United States
Ashley N. Egan United States
François Felber Switzerland
Diego Bogarín Costa Rica
Francisco Balao Spain
Brian G. Murray New Zealand
Jeffrey R. Ahern Finland
Daniel Ebert relative to Kevin Livingstone United States Kevin Livingstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kevin Livingstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ebert. The network helps show where Daniel Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009212
2 2010192
3 2013131
4 2013101
5 200399
6 201289
7 201170
8 201065
9 200957
10 201556
11 201743
12 200738
13 201536
14 200918
15 201615
16 200513
17 201012
18 20116
19
The use of spider silk in the initiation of nest-building by weaver ants (Formicidae: Formicinae: Polyrhachis)
19945
20 20053

About Daniel Ebert

Daniel Ebert is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers), Malaria Research and Control (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers) and Sunflower and Safflower Cultivation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (490 citations), Genetics (415 citations), Plant Science (462 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (147 citations) and Ecological Modeling (46 citations). Daniel Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rod Peakall, Loren H. Rieseberg, Nolan C. Kane, Dan G. Bock, Florian P. Schiestl, Colin C. Bower, Wittko Francke, Jacqueline Poldy, Russell A. Barrow and Rose L. Andrew. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Ecology Resources, Molecular Ecology, New Phytologist, BMC Plant Biology and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact