Michael M. Ting

3.5k citations
65 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. Ting

61 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Michael M. Ting
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Public Administration 164
  • Economics and Econometrics 929
  • Strategy and Management 434
  • Safety Research 133
Replace Hans‐Werner Sinn with:
Hans‐Werner Sinn Germany
Tommaso Nannicini Italy
Horst Siebert Germany
Ann Florini Singapore
Charles L. Schultze United States
Karl Ove Moene Norway
Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati Ireland
Ethan B. Kapstein United States
David Ulph United Kingdom
Matthias Busse Germany
Michael M. Ting relative to Hans‐Werner Sinn Germany Hans‐Werner Sinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Hans‐Werner Sinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Ting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Ting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Ting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Ting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Ting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Ting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Ting. The network helps show where Michael M. Ting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. Ting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. Ting Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. Ting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002325
2 2008225
3 2005120
4 2005109
5 201183
6 200383
7 201382
8 199775
9 200175
10 200372
11 200359
12 200956
13 200150
14 200245
15 201244
16 199944
17 200343
18 201138
19 200736
20 200833

About Michael M. Ting

Michael M. Ting is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (19 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (14 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (13 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (7 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Public Administration (164 citations), Economics and Econometrics (929 citations), Strategy and Management (434 citations) and Safety Research (133 citations). Michael M. Ting has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include James M. Snyder, Stephen Ansolabehere, Daniel Carpenter, Craig Volden, Lee Schipper, Marta Khrushch, Aaron Strauss, Daniel Diermeier, Jonathan Bendor and Fridtjof Unander. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics, American Political Science Review, Energy Policy and The Journal of Law Economics and Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact