Daniel Diermeier

6.2k citations
121 papers · 3.5k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Diermeier

116 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Diermeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.5k
  • Strategy and Management 736
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.3k
  • Safety Research 299
  • General Social Sciences 103
Replace Tyler Cowen with:
Tyler Cowen United States
R. Michael Alvarez United States
John F. Padgett United States
Fabrizio Gilardi Switzerland
Robin Mansell United Kingdom
Helen Margetts United Kingdom
Jonathan Nagler United States
Henry Farrell United States
Jonathan Bendor United States
Paul Attewell United States
Daniel Diermeier relative to Tyler Cowen United States Tyler Cowen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Tyler Cowen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Diermeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Diermeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Diermeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Diermeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Diermeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Diermeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Diermeier. The network helps show where Daniel Diermeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Diermeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Diermeier Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Diermeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007271
2 1998262
3 2015231
4 1999176
5 2001171
6 1999136
7 2000124
8 2003116
9 2011101
10 200399
11 201190
12 200889
13 201184
14 200384
15 200073
16 201166
17 201164
18 201461
19 199858
20 200557

About Daniel Diermeier

Daniel Diermeier is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 121 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (37 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (24 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (15 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (15 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (14 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (10 papers), Game Theory and Applications (9 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Strategy and Management (736 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.3k citations), Safety Research (299 citations) and General Social Sciences (103 citations). Daniel Diermeier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include David P. Baron, Antonio Merlo, Timothy Feddersen, Eric Luis Uhlmann, Roger B. Myerson, David A. Pizarro, Stefan Kaufmann, Randy Stevenson, Bei Yu and Hülya Eraslan. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, British Journal of Political Science, PLoS ONE, American Journal of Political Science and Social Choice and Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact