Michael Lin

2.3k citations
21 papers · 998 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Lin

21 papers receiving 954 citations

Peers

Michael Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • General Health Professions 361
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
  • Health Information Management 47
  • Occupational Therapy 36
Replace Lynn Austin with:
Lynn Austin United Kingdom
Marije Bosch Netherlands
Katherine R. Jones United States
Thérèse Van Durme Belgium
C. Johnman United Kingdom
Anita Atwal United Kingdom
M.A.H. Fleuren Netherlands
Jennifer Plumb United States
Iain Atherton United Kingdom
† Parker United Kingdom
Michael Lin relative to Lynn Austin United Kingdom Lynn Austin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lynn Austin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lin. The network helps show where Michael Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lin Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004293
2 2012197
3 201364
4 201062
5 200052
6 200244
7 200743
8 201138
9 200536
10 200030
11 200430
12 201621
13 200720
14 201217
15
Adherence to Pap test guidelines: variation among Asians in California.
200916
16 201213
17 201910
18 20127
19 20183
20 20201

About Michael Lin

Michael Lin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, Surgery and Occupational Therapy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (361 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations), Health Information Management (47 citations) and Occupational Therapy (36 citations). Michael Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas G. Castle, Peter Mendel, Marjorie L. Pearson, Mayde Rosen, Jill A. Marsteller, Stephen M. Shortell, Shan Cretin, Andrew M. Kramer, Jihad S. Obeid and José G. Conde. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Health Care Management Review, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Research in Developmental Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact