Katherine Hackett

27 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Katherine Hackett
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 155
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 13
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Replace Erica N. Madero with:
Erica N. Madero United States
Dean Sherzai United States
Kristiina Hongisto Finland
Flaminia Franchini Italy
Yoonseok Huh South Korea
Hyo Shin Kang South Korea
Roberta Ghiretti Italy
Marianna Trevisiol Italy
Alexandra Wade Australia
Elizabeth Guerrero‐Berroa United States
Katherine Hackett relative to Erica N. Madero United States Erica N. Madero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Erica N. Madero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Hackett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Hackett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Hackett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Hackett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Hackett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Hackett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Hackett. The network helps show where Katherine Hackett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Hackett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Hackett Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Hackett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201884
2 201842
3 202042
4 201641
5 202029
6 201825
7 202118
8 202217
9 201817
10 202214
11 201712
12 202210
13 20249
14 20218
15 20167
16 20206
17 20204
18 20114
19 20183
20 20253

About Katherine Hackett

Katherine Hackett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Physiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (155 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (13 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations). Katherine Hackett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Tania Giovannetti, Richard Isaacson, Alon Seifan, Emily Caesar, Lisa Mosconi, Robert Krikorian, Deborah A. G. Drabick, Aneela Rahman, Matthew W. Schelke and Hollie Hristov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact