Katherine Hackett

24 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Katherine Hackett
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 172
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
Replace Erica N. Madero with:
Erica N. Madero United States
Sarah L. Aghjayan United States
Anna Pink United States
Julia Fredrickson Australia
Dean Sherzai United States
Flaminia Franchini Italy
Joshua T. Fox‐Fuller United States
Danilla Icassatti Corazza Brazil
Hyo Shin Kang South Korea
Dana M. Swenson-Dravis United States
Katherine Hackett relative to Erica N. Madero United States Erica N. Madero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Erica N. Madero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Hackett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Hackett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Hackett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Hackett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Hackett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Hackett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Hackett. The network helps show where Katherine Hackett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Hackett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Hackett Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Hackett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201876
2 201841
3 202040
4 201637
5 202021
6 201820
7 202117
8 202216
9 201814
10 202210
11 201710
12 20217
13 20227
14 20167
15 20206
16 20246
17 20204
18 20183
19 20113
20 20242

About Katherine Hackett

Katherine Hackett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (7 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (172 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). Katherine Hackett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Tania Giovannetti, Richard Isaacson, Alon Seifan, Robert Krikorian, Lisa Mosconi, Emily Caesar, Deborah A. G. Drabick, Aneela Rahman, Hollie Hristov and Cara Berkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation and Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact