† Parker

948 citations
6 papers · 777 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

† Parker

4 papers receiving 752 citations

† Parker's Hit Papers

Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. 1998 · 749 citations
7490+9+18Years since publication200400600

Peers

† Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • General Health Professions 204
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Health Information Management 23
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Richard G. Best with:
Richard G. Best United States
Pamela G. Watson United States
Alison Roots Australia
C. Johnman United Kingdom
Lisa Fleet Canada
Mathilde M. H. Strating Netherlands
Jennifer Plumb United States
Jean Gayton Carroll United States
Katherine Carroll Australia
Leticia San Martín Rodríguez Spain
† Parker relative to Richard G. Best United States Richard G. Best's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Richard G. Best · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by † Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of † Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by † Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites † Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by † Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by † Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by † Parker. The network helps show where † Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside † Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with † Parker Line = papers co-authored together † Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Hit paper breakdown →
1998749
2 199925
3
Racial differences in infant mortality by cause of death and maternal age.
19842
4
A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE: MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF OPERATIONAL FATIGUE
19751
5
Challenges in determining how child work affects child health.
20050
6
Investigating employee perceptions of a framework of safety culture maturity.
20060

About † Parker

† Parker is a scholar working on Surgery, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Epidemiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (1 paper), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (1 paper), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (1 paper), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper) and Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (204 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Health Information Management (23 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation) † Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Murphy Murphy, Watson, Robert Dingwall, Matthew Lawrie, Deborah Levison and Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, Demography, Health Technology Assessment and Public Health Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact