Michael Lachney

46 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Michael Lachney
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Computer Science Applications 251
  • Gender Studies 111
  • Human-Computer Interaction 58
  • Safety Research 82
  • Education 260
Replace Audrey Bennett with:
Audrey Bennett United States
Nichole Pinkard United States
Amy Stornaiuolo United States
Caitlin K. Martin United States
William Babbitt United States
Bronwyn Bevan United States
Jakita O. Thomas United States
Wilhelmina Savenye United States
Kevin Clark United States
Sepehr Vakil United States
Michael Lachney relative to Audrey Bennett United States Audrey Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Audrey Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lachney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lachney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lachney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lachney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lachney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lachney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lachney. The network helps show where Michael Lachney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lachney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lachney Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lachney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201651
2 201950
3 201539
4 202036
5 201932
6 202128
7 202128
8 202126
9 201725
10 201922
11 202021
12 201921
13 202019
14 202118
15 201618
16 201516
17 201615
18 201812
19 202211
20
Software Design in the “Construction Genre” of Learning Technology: Content Aware versus Content Agnostic
201611

About Michael Lachney

Michael Lachney is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (20 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (11 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (5 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (4 papers), Career Development and Diversity (4 papers) and Digital Education and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (251 citations), Gender Studies (111 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations), Safety Research (82 citations) and Education (260 citations). Michael Lachney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Zambia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ron Eglash, William Babbitt, Audrey Bennett, Aman Yadav, James Davis, Martin Reinhardt, Rafi Santo, Jean J. Ryoo, David Banks and Dean Nieusma. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, TechTrends, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Communications of the ACM and International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact