Michael Köhl

3.8k citations
86 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Köhl

79 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael Köhl
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 798
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
  • Environmental Engineering 444
  • Insect Science 275
  • Forestry 89
Replace Gregory A. Reams with:
Gregory A. Reams United States
Devin Routh Switzerland
Christina L. Staudhammer United States
R.L. Graham United States
Sergio de‐Miguel Spain
Nobuya Mizoue Japan
Lars Laestadius United States
Maarten Nieuwenhuis Ireland
Christy M. Slay United States
Danilo Mollicone Italy
Michael Köhl relative to Gregory A. Reams United States Gregory A. Reams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gregory A. Reams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Köhl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Köhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Köhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Köhl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Köhl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Köhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Köhl. The network helps show where Michael Köhl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Köhl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Köhl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Köhl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996465
2 2015237
3 2015152
4 2016125
5 201492
6 199889
7 200075
8 200360
9 201558
10 201455
11 202153
12 200948
13 202345
14 201945
15 202043
16 201036
17 199435
18 200934
19 199733
20 201730

About Michael Köhl

Michael Köhl is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Insect Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (42 papers), Forest ecology and management (29 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (12 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (798 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations), Environmental Engineering (444 citations), Insect Science (275 citations) and Forestry (89 citations). Michael Köhl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich Spiecker, Kari Mielikäinen, Jens Peter Skovsgaard, W. Líese, Prem Raj Neupane, R. Päivinen, Philip Mundhenk, Kari Korhonen, Peter Bachmann and G. Stinson. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Policy and Economics, Carbon Balance and Management, Forest Science and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact