Carbon Balance and Management

10.9k citations
437 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Forest Management and Policy
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
    • Fire effects on ecosystems
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
    • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Papers in

    • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 26
    • Forest Management and Policy 24
    • Fire effects on ecosystems 22
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 21
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 20
    • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications 37

Carbon Balance and Management

204 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Carbon Balance and Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.8k
  • Environmental Engineering 3.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.9k
  • Ecology 3.2k
  • Forestry 502
Replace Current Forestry Reports with:
Current Forestry Reports United States
SOIL Germany
Journal of Land Use Science United States
Environmental Evidence United Kingdom
International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management Germany
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability China
Earth Interactions United States
Southern Forests a Journal of Forest Science South Africa
Remote Sensing Reviews United States
New Zealand journal of forestry science New Zealand
Carbon Balance and Management relative to Current Forestry Reports United States Current Forestry Reports's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Current Forestry Reports · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Carbon Balance and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Carbon Balance and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Carbon Balance and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon Balance and Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Carbon Balance and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Carbon Balance and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Carbon Balance and Management.

About Carbon Balance and Management

The 437 papers published in Carbon Balance and Management in the last decades have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Carbon Balance and Management usually cover Global and Planetary Change (101 papers), Environmental Engineering (60 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (30 papers), Horticulture (2 papers) and Soil Science (17 papers) specifically the topics of Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (37 papers), Forest ecology and management (30 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (26 papers), Forest Management and Policy (24 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (22 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (21 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (20 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Carbon Balance and Management are G. A. Alexandrov, Christopher W. Woodall, T. Pearson, Lara T. Murray, Sandra Brown, Ning Zeng, Jason C. Neff, Gregory P. Asner, Gabriel Sidman and Mehraj A. Sheikh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact