Michael J. Prentice

17 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Michael J. Prentice
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Statistics and Probability 81
  • Geometry and Topology 75
  • Environmental Engineering 66
  • Applied Mathematics 45
  • Artificial Intelligence 81
Replace Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen with:
Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen Denmark
Beatriz Pateiro‐López Spain
Shogo Kato Japan
Robert J. MacG. Dawson Canada
Alfred Kume United Kingdom
C. M. Theobald United Kingdom
Herbert Ziezold Germany
Suman Rakshit Australia
Norman C. Severo United States
Hui Rao China
Michael J. Prentice relative to Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen Denmark Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Prentice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Prentice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Prentice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Prentice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Prentice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Prentice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Prentice. The network helps show where Michael J. Prentice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Prentice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Prentice Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Prentice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198676
2 199756
3 198439
4 197938
5 197835
6 200026
7 198918
8 198718
9 199514
10 198711
11 199511
12 19829
13 19995
14 19894
15 19792
16 19882
17 19841

About Michael J. Prentice

Michael J. Prentice is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Applied Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Environmental Engineering and Geometry and Topology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical and numerical algorithms (6 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (5 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (5 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (2 papers) and Advanced Scientific Research Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (81 citations), Geometry and Topology (75 citations), Environmental Engineering (66 citations), Applied Mathematics (45 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (81 citations). Michael J. Prentice has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gráinne McGuire, Frank Wright, N. I. Fisher, Kanti V. Mardia, Roy Thompson and Ronald Pyke. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrika, The Annals of Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) and Biometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact