Michael Ingre

3.5k citations
64 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Ingre

57 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Michael Ingre
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 504
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 148
  • Occupational Therapy 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 287
Replace Melinda L. Jackson with:
Melinda L. Jackson Australia
Maria Thomas United States
Geoffrey E. Ott United States
Mikael Sallinen Finland
Kiti Müller Finland
Clare Anderson Australia
Jean-Claude Marquié France
Michael B. Russo United States
Julian Lim Singapore
Yasumasa Otsuka Japan
Michael Ingre relative to Melinda L. Jackson Australia Melinda L. Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Melinda L. Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ingre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ingre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ingre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ingre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ingre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ingre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ingre. The network helps show where Michael Ingre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ingre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ingre Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ingre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006288
2 2008137
3 2005129
4 2016114
5 2013113
6 2008102
7 200994
8 200693
9 201389
10 200973
11 201072
12 201060
13 200459
14 200858
15 201951
16 201450
17 200846
18 200345
19 201239
20 201334

About Michael Ingre

Michael Ingre is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (25 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (13 papers), Sleep and related disorders (13 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (504 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (148 citations), Occupational Therapy (82 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (287 citations). Michael Ingre has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Torbjörn Åkerstedt, Göran Kecklund, John Axelsson, Anna Anund, Mats Lekander, Björn Peters, Gustav Nilsonne, Jan‐Erik Broman, Ulf Holmbäck and Mirjam Ekstedt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sleep Research, Chronobiology International, PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact