Jens Nilsson

10 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

Jens Nilsson
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 413
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 182
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 51
  • Occupational Therapy 29
  • Biophysics 41
Replace Takeshi Munezawa with:
Takeshi Munezawa Japan
Ian Macdonald United Kingdom
Torbjörn Åkerstedt Sweden
Shelley Hershner United States
Krystyna Golonka Poland
Katie Moraes de Almondes Brazil
Franklin Brown United States
Tero Myllymäki Finland
Kate Bartel Australia
Chantal Kempenaers Belgium
Jens Nilsson relative to Takeshi Munezawa Japan Takeshi Munezawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Takeshi Munezawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Nilsson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Nilsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Nilsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Nilsson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Nilsson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Nilsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Nilsson. The network helps show where Jens Nilsson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jens Nilsson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens Nilsson Line = papers co-authored together Jens Nilsson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005267
2 2006174
3 200499
4 201269
5 201060
6 200753
7 200725
8
Fatigue in trans-Atlantic airline operations: diaries and actigraphy for two- vs. three-pilot crews.
200621
9 20251
10 20231

About Jens Nilsson

Jens Nilsson is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Occupational Therapy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (6 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (2 papers), Modeling and Simulation Systems (1 paper), Occupational Health and Performance (1 paper), Simulation Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (413 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (51 citations), Occupational Therapy (29 citations) and Biophysics (41 citations). Jens Nilsson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Torbjörn Åkerstedt, Marie Söderström, John Axelsson, Mirjam Ekstedt, Mats Lekander, Göran Kecklund, Aleksander Perski, Hans Peter Söndergaard, Kosuke Kaida and Clairy Wiholm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sleep Research, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, Clinical Neurophysiology, Industrial Health and Bioelectromagnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact