Michael Heym

2.1k citations
24 papers · 498 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Heym

24 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Michael Heym
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 292
  • Global and Planetary Change 272
  • Environmental Engineering 146
  • Ecological Modeling 43
  • Atmospheric Science 121
Replace Tobias Mette with:
Tobias Mette Germany
Gabriel H. P. M. Ribeiro United States
K. Gunia Finland
Robert Nuske Germany
M. N. dos-Santos Brazil
Nikolai Knapp Germany
Eduarda Martiniano de Oliveira Silveira Brazil
Ritika Srinet India
Osvaldo Valeria Canada
Michał Zasada Poland
Michael Heym relative to Tobias Mette Germany Tobias Mette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Tobias Mette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Heym

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Heym's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Heym with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Heym more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Heym

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Heym. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Heym. The network helps show where Michael Heym may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Heym, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Heym Line = papers co-authored together Michael Heym links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202062
2 201753
3 202349
4 202238
5 201935
6 202333
7 202031
8 201527
9 202022
10 202021
11 202020
12 202019
13 201717
14 201617
15 202113
16 202211
17 20149
18 20228
19 20245
20
A Comparison of P- and L-Band PolInSAR 3-D Forest Structure Estimates: A Study Case in the Traunstein Forest
20153

About Michael Heym

Michael Heym is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Insect Science and Environmental Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (5 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (292 citations), Global and Planetary Change (272 citations), Environmental Engineering (146 citations), Ecological Modeling (43 citations) and Atmospheric Science (121 citations). Michael Heym has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Hans Pretzsch, Enno Uhl, Konstantinos Papathanassiou, Michele Torresani, Duccio Rocchini, Giustino Tonon, Victor Cazcarra-Bes, Rico Fischer, Heidi C. Hauffe and Marc Zebisch. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forests, Ecological Indicators, European Journal of Forest Research and The Science of The Total Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact