Michael Häder

41 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Michael Häder
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Marketing 54
  • Periodontics 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 151
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 20
  • Clinical Psychology 54
Replace Quan Wang with:
Quan Wang China
Susanti Djalante Indonesia
S Moss United Kingdom
D.M. Tromp Netherlands
Samantha L. Jordan United States
Daniel Geiger Germany
Choirul Mahfud Indonesia
Irina Rafliana Indonesia
Henny Warsilah Indonesia
James Brown United Kingdom
Michael Häder relative to Quan Wang China Quan Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Quan Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Häder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Häder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Häder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Häder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Häder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Häder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Häder. The network helps show where Michael Häder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Häder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Häder Line = papers co-authored together Michael Häder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202160
2 201353
3 202042
4
Delphi und Kognitionspsychologie: ein Zugang zur theoretischen Fundierung der Delphi-Methode
199538
5 200235
6 200935
7 201527
8 200025
9 202025
10 201221
11 201921
12 202020
13 202218
14 201815
15 202112
16 202111
17
Die Expertenauswahl bei Delphi-Befragungen
20009
18 19869
19
Rezension: Frank Faulbaum, Peter Prüfer und Margrit Rexroth, 2009: Was ist eine gute Frage? Die systematische Evaluation der Fragenqualität
20097
20 20227

About Michael Häder

Michael Häder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Psychology, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Delphi Technique in Research (7 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (6 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (6 papers), Corporate Management and Leadership (3 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (3 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (3 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (3 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (54 citations), Periodontics (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (151 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (20 citations) and Clinical Psychology (54 citations). Michael Häder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sabine Häder, Benjamin Frey, Udo S. Gaipl, Rainer Fietkau, Markus Hecht, Daniel B. Fassnacht, Patrick Trotzke, Nora M. Laskowski, Matthias Brand and Martina de Zwaan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, International Journal of Hyperthermia, Cancers, International Journal of Practical Theology and Journal of Behavioral Addictions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact