Michael Gehl

1.4k citations
50 papers · 584 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Gehl

46 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Michael Gehl
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Instrumentation 54
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 367
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 435
  • Biophysics 27
  • Artificial Intelligence 79
Replace Neil Na with:
Neil Na Taiwan
W. J. Zhang China
Simon Hönl Switzerland
Sergiy M. Dobrovolskiy Netherlands
Bowen Song United States
A. Cross United States
R.D. Younger United States
Derek C. S. Dumas United Kingdom
Wladick Hartmann Germany
Martin A. Wolff Germany
Michael Gehl relative to Neil Na Taiwan Neil Na's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Neil Na · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gehl. The network helps show where Michael Gehl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gehl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gehl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202086
2 201781
3 202265
4 201755
5 202242
6 201731
7 201919
8 201518
9 202017
10 202413
11 201213
12 202412
13 201012
14 202411
15 201910
16 20249
17 20109
18 20109
19 20169
20 20147

About Michael Gehl

Michael Gehl is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Materials Chemistry, having authored 50 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (32 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (20 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (13 papers), Optical Network Technologies (6 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (5 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers) and Photonic Crystals and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (54 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (367 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (435 citations), Biophysics (27 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (79 citations). Michael Gehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Anthony L. Lentine, Andrew Starbuck, Andrew Pomerene, Christopher T. DeRose, Douglas C. Trotter, Christina Dallo, Dana Hood, Nicholas Martinez, Nicholas Boynton and Paul Davids. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Nature Communications, Journal of Crystal Growth, AIP Advances and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact