Michael Gehl

904 citations
49 papers · 550 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Gehl

44 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Michael Gehl
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Instrumentation 54
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 350
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 417
  • Biophysics 27
  • Artificial Intelligence 77
Replace R.D. Younger with:
R.D. Younger United States
Sergiy M. Dobrovolskiy Netherlands
A. Cross United States
F.J. O’Donnell United States
Neil Na Taiwan
Derek C. S. Dumas United Kingdom
Bowen Song United States
Peter Vines United Kingdom
Wladick Hartmann Germany
Vincenzo Pusino United Kingdom
Michael Gehl relative to R.D. Younger United States R.D. Younger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
R.D. Younger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gehl. The network helps show where Michael Gehl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gehl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gehl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202081
2 201779
3 202261
4 201754
5 202241
6 201729
7 201518
8 202017
9 201917
10 202412
11 202411
12 201011
13 202410
14 201910
15 201210
16 20109
17 20109
18 20168
19 20147
20 20246

About Michael Gehl

Michael Gehl is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Materials Chemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (31 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (20 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (13 papers), Optical Network Technologies (6 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (4 papers) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (54 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (350 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (417 citations), Biophysics (27 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (77 citations). Michael Gehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Anthony L. Lentine, Andrew Starbuck, Andrew Pomerene, Christopher T. DeRose, Douglas C. Trotter, Christina Dallo, Dana Hood, Paul Davids, G. Khitrova and Christopher M. Long. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Nature Communications, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Optica and Journal of Crystal Growth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact