Peter Vines

461 citations
30 papers · 351 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Vines

26 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Peter Vines
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Instrumentation 202
  • Biophysics 85
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 136
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 243
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
Replace Derek C. S. Dumas with:
Derek C. S. Dumas United Kingdom
R.D. Younger United States
Y. Yamashita Taiwan
Tamer A. Elkhatib United States
P. I. Hopman United States
Eric de Borniol France
Adriano Della Frera Italy
R. Ben-Michael United States
Francesca Madonini Italy
Peter Vines relative to Derek C. S. Dumas United Kingdom Derek C. S. Dumas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Derek C. S. Dumas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vines. The network helps show where Peter Vines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Vines Line = papers co-authored together Peter Vines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019147
2 201959
3 201135
4 202030
5 201111
6 20087
7 20116
8 20196
9 20125
10 20105
11 20115
12
High performance planar Ge-on-Si single-photon avalanche diode detectors
20185
13 20164
14 20104
15 20143
16 20193
17 20193
18 20072
19 20192
20 20201

About Peter Vines

Peter Vines is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Spectroscopy and Biophysics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (12 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (10 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (9 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (7 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (5 papers) and Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (202 citations), Biophysics (85 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (136 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (243 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations). Peter Vines has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Gerald S. Buller, Jarosław Kirdoda, Douglas J. Paul, Ross W. Millar, Derek C. S. Dumas, Muhammad Mirza, Chee Hing Tan, J.P.R. David, Andrew Marshall and Pin Jern Ker. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Nature Communications, Optics Express, Optics Letters and Journal of Instrumentation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact