Michael Forger

1.5k citations
45 papers · 923 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Forger

41 papers receiving 867 citations

Peers

Michael Forger
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 507
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 530
  • Geometry and Topology 342
  • Algebra and Number Theory 74
  • Mathematical Physics 145
Replace Laszlo Feher with:
Laszlo Feher Hungary
Bertrand Eynard France
ARTHUR G. WASSERMAN United States
Rinat Mavlyavievich Kashaev Switzerland
A. Sciarrino Italy
Anton A. Gerasimov Russia
Yavuz Nutku Türkiye
M. A. del Olmo Spain
Aristophanes Dimakis Greece
Henrik Aratyn United States
Michael Forger relative to Laszlo Feher Hungary Laszlo Feher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Laszlo Feher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Forger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Forger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Forger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Forger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Forger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Forger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Forger. The network helps show where Michael Forger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Michael Forger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Forger Line = papers co-authored together Michael Forger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979208
2 198098
3 198659
4 198157
5 198254
6 200533
7 200332
8 197831
9 198525
10 201024
11 199721
12 199219
13 201319
14 199318
15 200418
16 200018
17 199918
18 199814
19 198614
20 201013

About Michael Forger

Michael Forger is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 45 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (23 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (17 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (17 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (10 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (8 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (8 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (507 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (530 citations), Geometry and Topology (342 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (74 citations) and Mathematical Physics (145 citations). Michael Forger has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Harald Eichenherr, Élcio Abdalla, José Eduardo Martinho Hornos, Martin Bordemann, Hartmann Römer, M. Gomes, Fernando Antoneli, Allen Back, P. Freund and Alexandre Ferreira Ramos. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Lecture notes in physics and Physics Letters B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact