Lecture notes in physics

1.0k papers and 69.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Lecture notes in physics in the last decades have received a total of 69.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Lecture notes in physics usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (233 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (173 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (137 papers) specifically the topics of Relativity and Gravitational Theory (79 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (65 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lecture notes in physics are Enrique Sanchez-Palencia, Robert Alicki, K. Lendi, Ken Sekimoto, Huzihiro Araki, Mitchell D. Smooke, Andrzej Pękalski, Arno Böhm, Dieter Britz and Sergey Nazarenko.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Lecture notes in physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lecture notes in physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lecture notes in physics.

Countries where authors publish in Lecture notes in physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lecture notes in physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lecture notes in physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lecture notes in physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025