Michaël Esfeld

74 papers receiving 826 citations

Peers

Michaël Esfeld
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 586
  • Theoretical Computer Science 22
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 258
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 562
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 168
Replace Richard Healey with:
Richard Healey United States
Paul Teller United States
Craig Callender United States
James T. Cushing United States
Tim Maudlin United States
Alyssa Ney United States
Jeremy Butterfield United Kingdom
Alisa Bokulich United States
Lawrence Sklar United States
Nick Huggett United States
Michaël Esfeld relative to Richard Healey United States Richard Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Richard Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Esfeld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Esfeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Esfeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Esfeld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Esfeld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Esfeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Esfeld. The network helps show where Michaël Esfeld may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Esfeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Esfeld Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Esfeld links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006108
2 200482
3 201375
4 201453
5 201748
6 200142
7 200938
8 200937
9 201526
10 201226
11 199823
12 201222
13 201421
14 200719
15 201418
16 200717
17 201117
18 201816
19 201215
20 201714

About Michaël Esfeld

Michaël Esfeld is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Philosophy, having authored 86 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (45 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (40 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (27 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (14 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (13 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (586 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (258 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (562 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (168 citations). Michaël Esfeld has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Lam, Dustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert, Mauro Dorato, Detlef Dürr, Dirk-André Deckert, Nicolas Gisin, Michael H. Herzog, Wulfram Gerstner and Hans Primas. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis and International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact