Michaël Esfeld

98 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michaël Esfeld
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • History and Philosophy of Science 868
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 370
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 778
  • Theoretical Computer Science 26
  • Philosophy 170
Replace Richard Healey with:
Richard Healey United States
David Wallace United States
Craig Callender United States
Paul Teller United States
Mauro Dorato Italy
Alyssa Ney United States
James T. Cushing United States
Tim Maudlin United States
Nick Huggett United States
Alisa Bokulich United States
Michaël Esfeld relative to Richard Healey United States Richard Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Richard Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Esfeld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Esfeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Esfeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Esfeld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Esfeld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Esfeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Esfeld. The network helps show where Michaël Esfeld may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Esfeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Esfeld Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Esfeld links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006138
2 2004104
3 201398
4 201469
5 201765
6 200959
7 201055
8 200955
9 200152
10 201537
11 201235
12 201228
13 199827
14 201426
15 200725
16
Philosophie der Physik
201224
17 201424
18 201122
19 201220
20 200720

About Michaël Esfeld

Michaël Esfeld is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Physiology, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (62 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (54 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (38 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (18 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (16 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (868 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (370 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (778 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (26 citations) and Philosophy (170 citations). Michaël Esfeld has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Lam, Dustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert, Mauro Dorato, Detlef Dürr, Dirk-André Deckert, Nicolas Gisin, Michael H. Herzog, Wulfram Gerstner and Holger Lyre. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact