Michael Emond

10 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Michael Emond
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 327
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 228
  • Physiology 123
  • Clinical Psychology 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 69
Replace Aidan Makwana with:
Aidan Makwana United Kingdom
Carolyn E. Pritchett United States
Carlos Canova Germany
Deniz Atalayer United States
M. Fichter Germany
Mario Maj Italy
Britny A. Hildebrandt United States
Shannon L. Cole United States
Kristin J. Rudenga United States
Emilio Gutiérrez Spain
Michael Emond relative to Aidan Makwana United Kingdom Aidan Makwana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Aidan Makwana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Emond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Emond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Emond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Emond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Emond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Emond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Emond. The network helps show where Michael Emond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael Emond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Emond Line = papers co-authored together Michael Emond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1999204
2 200172
3 200154
4 199542
5 201634
6 201633
7 201627
8 199814
9 201210
10 20048

About Michael Emond

Michael Emond is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Fashion and Cultural Textiles (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (327 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (228 citations), Physiology (123 citations), Clinical Psychology (81 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (69 citations). Michael Emond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary J. Schwartz, Timothy H. Moran, Ellen E. Ladenheim, Harvey P. Weingarten, Sherry Van Blyderveen, Joanna E. Scheib, Amanda Stillar, Kayla Ten Eycke, Adèle Lafrance Robinson and Adèle Lafrance. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Behavioural Pharmacology, Evolutionary Psychology and Appetite.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact