Evolutionary Psychology

814 papers and 15.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 814 papers published in Evolutionary Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 15.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Evolutionary Psychology usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (568 papers), Sociology and Political Science (338 papers) and Social Psychology (234 papers) specifically the topics of Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (541 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (180 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evolutionary Psychology are Menelaos Apostolou, Todd K. Shackelford, David M. Buss, Daniel J. Kruger, Robert Kurzban, Robin Dunbar, Gordon G. Gallup, Peter K. Jonason, David P. Schmitt and Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evolutionary Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evolutionary Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evolutionary Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Evolutionary Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evolutionary Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evolutionary Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolutionary Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026