Michael Eckart
Impact in
- Hepatology top 2%
- Hepatitis C virus research
- Structural Biology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 4
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 3
- Genetics 9
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 8
- Co-authors
- Lucy Shapiro (6 shared papers)W. E. Moerner (3 shared papers)Luis R. Comolli (2 shared papers)Rainer Roggenkamp (4 shared papers)Zbigniew A. Janowicz (4 shared papers)Cornelis P. Hollenberg (4 shared papers)Jerod L. Ptacin (2 shared papers)Grant R. Bowman (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Investigation (3 papers)mBio (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Eckart
29 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Michael Eckart's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Hepatology 367
- Structural Biology 50
- Endocrinology 106
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Genetics 549
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Eckart
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Eckart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Eckart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Eckart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Eckart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Eckart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Eckart. The network helps show where Michael Eckart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Eckart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A spindle-like apparatus guides bacterial chromosome segregation Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 266 |
| 2 | 2008 | 255 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 196 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 177 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 166 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 144 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 118 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 110 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 105 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 94 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 94 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 76 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 20 |
About Michael Eckart
Michael Eckart is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Hepatology, Ecology and Immunology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (8 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (5 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (3 papers) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (367 citations), Structural Biology (50 citations), Endocrinology (106 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations) and Genetics (549 citations). Michael Eckart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Shapiro, W. E. Moerner, Luis R. Comolli, Rainer Roggenkamp, Zbigniew A. Janowicz, Cornelis P. Hollenberg, Jerod L. Ptacin, Grant R. Bowman, Michael Houghton and Q L Choo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, mBio, PLoS ONE, Nucleic Acids Research and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.