Fraser Conrad

945 citations
25 papers · 748 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Fraser Conrad

24 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Fraser Conrad
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Neurology 276
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 209
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 251
  • Immunology and Allergy 57
  • Immunology 122
Replace Namir J. Hassan with:
Namir J. Hassan United Kingdom
Inka Scheffrahn Germany
Hanspeter Amstutz Switzerland
Helen Chung United States
R A Reisfeld United States
Gabrielle J. Grundy United Kingdom
Carlos Vaccaro United States
Ignacio Gonzales-Gomez United States
Adriana Carr Cuba
Fraser Conrad relative to Namir J. Hassan United Kingdom Namir J. Hassan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Namir J. Hassan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Conrad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Conrad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Conrad. The network helps show where Fraser Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Conrad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Conrad Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Conrad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201889
2 200481
3 201075
4 200767
5 201059
6 201254
7 201835
8 200734
9 201631
10 201127
11 200925
12 201725
13 201224
14 201122
15 201519
16 201517
17 201915
18 201915
19 20189
20 20218

About Fraser Conrad

Fraser Conrad is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oncology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (17 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (15 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (276 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (209 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (251 citations), Immunology and Allergy (57 citations) and Immunology (122 citations). Fraser Conrad has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include James D. Marks, Jianlong Lou, Dmitri B. Kirpotin, Yongfeng Fan, Bin Liu, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Bin Liu, Daryl C. Drummond, Theresa J. Smith and Jianbo Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Toxins, PLoS ONE, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Protein Engineering Design and Selection and Journal of Molecular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact