Michael E. Carney

15 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Michael E. Carney
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Reproductive Medicine 211
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 133
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 53
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 193
  • Genetics 212
Replace Khoi Chu with:
Khoi Chu United States
Jan Broder Engler Germany
Annie Cambourg France
Davelene D. Israel United States
Iris Fuchs Germany
Jennifer S. Ferris United States
Chutaro Yamanaka Japan
M I New United States
Roberta B. Todd United States
P. Borboni Italy
Michael E. Carney relative to Khoi Chu United States Khoi Chu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Khoi Chu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Carney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Carney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Carney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Carney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Carney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Carney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Carney. The network helps show where Michael E. Carney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Carney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Carney Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Carney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
PTEN mutation in endometrial cancers is associated with favorable clinical and pathologic characteristics.
1998240
2
Frequency of germline and somatic BRCA1 mutations in ovarian cancer.
1998141
3 2008103
4 200781
5 201048
6 201238
7 200838
8 200735
9 200826
10 200823
11 201721
12 201019
13 199815
14
A polymorphism in the GALNT2 gene and ovarian cancer risk in four population based case-control studies.
20105
15 19992

About Michael E. Carney

Michael E. Carney is a scholar working on Genetics, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers) and Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (211 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (133 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (53 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (193 citations) and Genetics (212 citations). Michael E. Carney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Berchuck, Marc T. Goodman, Galina Lurie, Pamela J. Thompson, R K Dodge, G. Larry Maxwell, Debra J. Magnuson, Kelly S. Hayes, John I. Risinger and Thackery S. Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Cancer Causes & Control, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology and International Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact