Michael Bird

1.2k citations
28 papers · 989 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Bird

27 papers receiving 861 citations

Peers

Michael Bird
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 281
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Toxicology 24
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
Replace G. A. Smith with:
G. A. Smith Australia
P. Jane Mutch United States
Juliana Setyawan United States
Ismaël Conejero France
Colin Brewer United Kingdom
Abhishek Ghosh India
Sohrab Amiri Iran
Richard Trigg United Kingdom
Raman Baweja United States
Ting Hu China
Michael Bird relative to G. A. Smith Australia G. A. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
G. A. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bird. The network helps show where Michael Bird may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bird Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bird links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018154
2
Assessment of the abuse liability of buspirone in recreational sedative users.
1982132
3 200077
4 200161
5 201659
6 201354
7 199353
8 199152
9 199642
10 201441
11 201637
12 201833
13 201933
14 201231
15 198827
16 201621
17 198814
18 202211
19 20189
20 20109

About Michael Bird

Michael Bird is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology and Pharmacology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (281 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Toxicology (24 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations). Michael Bird has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary A. Luszcz, Philip E. Dawson, Dillon T. Flood, Jordi C. J. Hintzen, Philip A. Cistrone, Maressa Hecht Orzack, Jason S. Chen, Julie Cole, Katie E. Cherry and Cameron J. Camp. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Rural and Remote Health, Aging & Mental Health, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Innovation in Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact