Daniel O’Connor

7.7k citations
151 papers · 4.9k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel O’Connor

148 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Daniel O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.3k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 161
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 259
  • Health 332
  • General Health Professions 842
Replace Barry W. Rovner with:
Barry W. Rovner United States
Tom Dening United Kingdom
Sytse U. Zuidema Netherlands
Tobias Luck Germany
Lee‐Fay Low Australia
Josep Garre‐Olmo Spain
Siegfried Weyerer Germany
Aimee Spector United Kingdom
Michael Pentzek Germany
Melanie Luppa Germany
Daniel O’Connor relative to Barry W. Rovner United States Barry W. Rovner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Barry W. Rovner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel O’Connor. The network helps show where Daniel O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Daniel O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989215
2 1989212
3 1990199
4 1988196
5 2008190
6 1989153
7 1998133
8 1999122
9 2007116
10 1995112
11 1990104
12 2009102
13 200096
14 199595
15 201289
16 200087
17 199885
18 199178
19
Dementia and normal aging
199477
20 201374

About Daniel O’Connor

Daniel O’Connor is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health, having authored 151 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (44 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (22 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (15 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.3k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (161 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (259 citations), Health (332 citations) and General Health Professions (842 citations). Daniel O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. A. Pollitt, B. B. Reiss, C. P. B. Brook, Carol Brayne, Felicia A. Huppert, Martin Roth, Betina Gardner, Barbara Eppingstall, Eva S. van der Ploeg and Eugene S. Paykel. Their work appears in journals such as International Psychogeriatrics, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Australasian Journal on Ageing, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact