Michael Banov

1.5k citations
16 papers · 1.1k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Banov

14 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Michael Banov
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 768
  • Biological Psychiatry 66
  • Neurology 99
  • Pharmacology 180
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 81
Replace Teresa Huggins with:
Teresa Huggins United States
T A Ketter United States
René S. Kahn Netherlands
Antonio Tundo Italy
Annalisa Anastasia Italy
Gabriela Cora‐Locatelli United States
Arantzazu Zabala Spain
Jürgen De Fruyt Belgium
Erik Kolshus Ireland
Donald R. Kanter United States
Michael Banov relative to Teresa Huggins United States Teresa Huggins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Teresa Huggins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Banov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Banov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Banov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Banov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Banov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Banov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Banov. The network helps show where Michael Banov may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Banov, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Banov Line = papers co-authored together Michael Banov links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2006222
2
A double-blind trial of bupropion versus desipramine for bipolar depression.
1994217
3 2012126
4
Is clozapine a mood stabilizer?
199593
5
Clozapine therapy in refractory affective disorders: polarity predicts response in long-term follow-up.
199491
6 200089
7 200866
8 201062
9 199434
10 201928
11 199622
12 200819
13 199310
14 20213
15 20181
16 20250

About Michael Banov

Michael Banov is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper) and Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (768 citations), Biological Psychiatry (66 citations), Neurology (99 citations), Pharmacology (180 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (81 citations). Michael Banov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Mauricio Tohen, Carlos A. Zarate, J F Rosenbaum, Beny Lafer, Andrej Stoll, A Thibault, Charles L. Bowden, Richard C. Risser, Robert W. Baker and Holland C. Detke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, American Journal of Psychiatry, CNS Spectrums, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Annals of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact