Michael B. Devlin

29 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Michael B. Devlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gender Studies 199
  • Communication 65
  • Marketing 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 240
Replace Natalie Brown‐Devlin with:
Natalie Brown‐Devlin United States
Brody James Ruihley United States
Robert W. Meeds United States
Jerred Junqi Wang United States
Steven Holiday United States
Hayoung Sally Lim United States
Lucy L. Henke United States
Abdullah J. Sultan Kuwait
Stephanie Orme United States
Gayle S. Stever United States
Michael B. Devlin relative to Natalie Brown‐Devlin United States Natalie Brown‐Devlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Natalie Brown‐Devlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. Devlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. Devlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. Devlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. Devlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. Devlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. Devlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. Devlin. The network helps show where Michael B. Devlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michael B. Devlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael B. Devlin Line = papers co-authored together Michael B. Devlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 201825
3 201324
4 201722
5 201720
6 201720
7 201116
8 201314
9 201914
10 201613
11 201913
12 201613
13 201713
14 201913
15 201512
16 202012
17 202011
18 202011
19 201310
20 201610

About Michael B. Devlin

Michael B. Devlin is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (19 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (14 papers), Media Influence and Health (13 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (199 citations), Communication (65 citations), Marketing (64 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (65 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (240 citations). Michael B. Devlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew C. Billings, Natalie Brown‐Devlin, Kenon A. Brown, Natalie A. Brown, Kim Bartel Sheehan, Phillip W. Vaughan, Paul La Bounty, Coy Callison, Melvin Lewis and Hayoung Sally Lim. Their work appears in journals such as Communication & Sport, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Communication Research Reports, International Review for the Sociology of Sport and International Journal of Business Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact