Mel Stanfill

1.0k citations
48 papers · 450 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Social Media and Politics
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media
    • Media, Gender, and Advertising

Papers in

Mel Stanfill

42 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Mel Stanfill
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Communication 130
  • Gender Studies 163
  • Cultural Studies 70
  • Music 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 276
Replace Suzanne D. Scott with:
Suzanne D. Scott United States
Lucy Bennett United Kingdom
Sangita Shresthova United States
Bingchun Meng United Kingdom
Fredrik Stiernstedt Sweden
Michael Z. Newman United States
Stephen B. Crofts Wiley United States
Amparo Lasén Spain
Elizabeth Ellcessor United States
Lothar Mikos Germany
Mel Stanfill relative to Suzanne D. Scott United States Suzanne D. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Suzanne D. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mel Stanfill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mel Stanfill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mel Stanfill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mel Stanfill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mel Stanfill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mel Stanfill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mel Stanfill. The network helps show where Mel Stanfill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mel Stanfill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mel Stanfill Line = papers co-authored together Mel Stanfill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201484
2 201341
3 201941
4 201438
5 201937
6 201922
7 201119
8 201818
9 201817
10 202113
11
Exploiting Fandom: How the Media Industry Seeks to Manipulate Fans
201912
12 202211
13 201211
14 20169
15 20237
16 20236
17 20216
18 20215
19 20245
20 20235

About Mel Stanfill

Mel Stanfill is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Cultural Studies, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 48 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (22 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (19 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (13 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (130 citations), Gender Studies (163 citations), Cultural Studies (70 citations), Music (23 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (276 citations). Mel Stanfill has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Anastasia Salter, Alexis Lothian, Angharad N. Valdivia, Anne M. Sullivan, Stephen M. Fiore, Ivan I. Garibay and William M. Rand. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, New Media & Society, International Journal of Cultural Studies, Social & Legal Studies and Porn Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact