Mel Stanfill
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Digital Games and Media 20
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 16
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 7
- Co-authors
- Alexis Lothian (1 shared paper)Angharad N. Valdivia (1 shared paper)Anastasia Salter (10 shared papers)Anne Sullivan (5 shared papers)Stephen M. Fiore (1 shared paper)Iván Garibay (1 shared paper)William Rand (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Media & Society (2 papers)Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (2 papers)Communication Theory (1 paper)International Journal of Cultural Studies (1 paper)Journal of Film and Video (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Mel Stanfill
33 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Communication 108
- Gender Studies 146
- Cultural Studies 63
- Music 18
- Sociology and Political Science 235
Countries citing papers authored by Mel Stanfill
This map shows the geographic impact of Mel Stanfill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mel Stanfill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mel Stanfill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mel Stanfill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mel Stanfill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mel Stanfill. The network helps show where Mel Stanfill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mel Stanfill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 11 | Exploiting Fandom: How the Media Industry Seeks to Manipulate Fans | 2019 | 11 |
| 12 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 3 |
About Mel Stanfill
Mel Stanfill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Cultural Studies, Communication and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 40 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (20 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (16 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (13 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (7 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (108 citations), Gender Studies (146 citations), Cultural Studies (63 citations), Music (18 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (235 citations). Mel Stanfill has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Alexis Lothian, Angharad N. Valdivia, Anastasia Salter, Anne Sullivan, Stephen M. Fiore, Iván Garibay and William Rand. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Communication Theory, International Journal of Cultural Studies and Journal of Film and Video.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.