Michael Awkward
Impact in
- Music top 5%
- Music History and Culture
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
-
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 4
- Critical Race Theory in Education 1
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 1
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Nellie Y. McKay (1 shared paper)Claudia Tate (1 shared paper)Linda Wagner‐Martin (1 shared paper)Trinh T. Minh‐ha (1 shared paper)Robert B. Stepto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- African American Review (2 papers)American Literary History (2 papers)Modern Philology (1 paper)Callaloo (1 paper)Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Awkward
12 papers receiving 80 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Music 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 80
- Cultural Studies 38
- Gender Studies 33
- Sociology and Political Science 98
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Awkward
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Awkward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Awkward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Awkward more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Awkward
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Awkward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Awkward. The network helps show where Michael Awkward may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael Awkward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0 |
About Michael Awkward
Michael Awkward is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (2 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Music History and Culture (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (44 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (80 citations), Cultural Studies (38 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (98 citations). Michael Awkward has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nellie Y. McKay, Claudia Tate, Linda Wagner‐Martin, Trinh T. Minh‐ha and Robert B. Stepto. Their work appears in journals such as African American Review, American Literary History, Modern Philology, Callaloo and Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.