MELUS Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States · 1×
×1.4690/511MUSIC
×0.92k/3kLLT
×0.72k/2kCS
×3.7591/158RS
×1.6939/589ANTHR
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Callaloo
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Callaloo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Callaloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Callaloo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Callaloo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Callaloo.
About Callaloo
The 2.0k papers published in Callaloo in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Callaloo usually cover Music (114 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (374 papers), Cultural Studies (250 papers), Religious studies (124 papers) and Anthropology (132 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (178 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (143 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (140 papers), Caribbean and African Literature and Culture (118 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (98 papers), Music History and Culture (88 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (72 papers) and African history and culture studies (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Callaloo are Charles H Rowell, Silvio Torres‐Saillant, John Sekora, James Olney, Brent Hayes Edwards, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Dwight A. McBride, Herman Gray, Yusef Komunyakaa and R. Radhakrishnan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.