Countries where authors publish in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature.
About Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature
The 821 papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (668 papers), Gender Studies (156 papers), Religious studies (92 papers), Classics (45 papers) and History (128 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (209 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (144 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (137 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (134 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (115 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (98 papers), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (83 papers) and American Literature and Culture (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature are Jane Tompkins, Elisabeth Bronfen, Camille Naish, Ann L. Ardis, Judith Halberstam, Joseph A. Kestner, Jennifer L. Fleissner, Lillian S. Robinson, Paula Bernat Bennett and Rita Felski.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.