Countries where authors publish in African American Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in African American Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in African American Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African American Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in African American Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in African American Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in African American Review.
About African American Review
The 1.5k papers published in African American Review in the last decades have received a total of 18.7k indexed citations . Papers published in African American Review usually cover Music (177 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (457 papers), Cultural Studies (205 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (87 papers) and History (153 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (371 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (196 papers), Music History and Culture (120 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (92 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (83 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (79 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (74 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in African American Review are Peter B. Erickson, Paul Gilroy, Daryl Michael Scott, William Julius Wilson, Houston A. Baker, Tricia Rose, Candice Marie Jenkins, Fred Moten, bell hooks and Michael Bérubé.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.