Michael A. Peat
Impact in
- Toxicology top 2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 4
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- James W. Gibb (4 shared papers)Bryan S. Finkle (4 shared papers)Dennis J. Crouch (1 shared paper)Thomas A. Jennison (1 shared paper)Charles Bakhit (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Schmidt (1 shared paper)Glen R. Hanson (1 shared paper)George E. Dukes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology (3 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (1 paper)Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1 paper)European Journal of Pharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael A. Peat
13 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Toxicology 90
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 147
- Biological Psychiatry 7
- Analytical Chemistry 27
- Spectroscopy 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Peat
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Peat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Peat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Peat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Peat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Peat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Peat. The network helps show where Michael A. Peat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Peat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 83 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 0 |
About Michael A. Peat
Michael A. Peat is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Toxicology and Pharmacology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (1 paper), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (1 paper) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (90 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (147 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Analytical Chemistry (27 citations) and Spectroscopy (43 citations). Michael A. Peat has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James W. Gibb, Bryan S. Finkle, Dennis J. Crouch, Thomas A. Jennison, Charles Bakhit, Christopher J. Schmidt, Glen R. Hanson, George E. Dukes, Cho‐Ming Loi and Douglas E. Rollins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and European Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.