Meredith Manze

42 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Meredith Manze
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Family Practice 37
  • Health 62
  • Clinical Psychology 148
  • General Health Professions 126
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 111
Replace Marie N. Fongwa with:
Marie N. Fongwa United States
Jaya Dantas Australia
Olivia G. M. Washington United States
Anne Stimpson United Kingdom
Arwa Oweis Jordan
Daniel Palazuelos United States
Andrea M. Russell United States
Austyn Snowden United Kingdom
Haslyn Hunte United States
Ariella Lang Canada
Meredith Manze relative to Marie N. Fongwa United States Marie N. Fongwa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Marie N. Fongwa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Manze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Manze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Manze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Manze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Manze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Manze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Manze. The network helps show where Meredith Manze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Manze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Manze Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Manze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008134
2 2019126
3 202188
4 201081
5 200935
6 201535
7 201031
8 201529
9 201922
10 202021
11 202021
12 201421
13 201720
14 200919
15 201018
16 201413
17 202111
18 202210
19 202210
20 20219

About Meredith Manze

Meredith Manze is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (14 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (37 citations), Health (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (148 citations), General Health Professions (126 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (111 citations). Meredith Manze has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Nancy R. Kressin, Heidi E. Jones, Michelle B. Orner, Dan R. Berlowitz, Sandra E. Echeverría, Daliah Heller, Diana Romero, Nicholas Freudenberg, Mark E. Glickman and Victoria K. Ngo. Their work appears in journals such as Contraception, Journal of Urban Health, BMJ, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes and Journal of American College Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact