Contraception

8.0k papers and 151.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.0k papers published in Contraception in the last decades have received a total of 151.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Contraception usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (5.4k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.3k papers) and Reproductive Medicine (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Health and Contraception (4.7k papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1.1k papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contraception are James Trussell, Kathryn M. Curtis, Mitchell D. Creinin, Anna Glasier, Lawrence B. Finer, Carolyn Westhoff, Daniel R. Mishell, K. Fotherby, Mia R. Zolna and Elof D.B. Johansson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contraception

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contraception. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contraception.

Countries where authors publish in Contraception

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contraception. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contraception with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contraception more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025