Menna Brown
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1
- Health 2
- Social Media in Health Education 1
- Gun Ownership and Violence Research 1
- Co-authors
- Ann John (6 shared papers)Alice E. Hoon (2 shared papers)A. Glendenning (1 shared paper)Parisa Eslambolchilar (2 shared papers)Matt Jones (1 shared paper)Hugo van Woerden (1 shared paper)Philip Tucker (2 shared papers)Anna Dahlgren (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (1 paper)JMIR Mental Health (1 paper)Academic Psychiatry (1 paper)The Clinical Teacher (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Menna Brown
15 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Applied Psychology 134
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
- Clinical Psychology 117
- General Health Professions 91
- Health 19
Countries citing papers authored by Menna Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Menna Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Menna Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Menna Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Menna Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Menna Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Menna Brown. The network helps show where Menna Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Menna Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 12 | A comparative study of the construction and implementation of patient choice policies in the UK. | 2011 | 7 |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 16 | Cinderella’s story: the psychosocial impact of pituitary conditions | 2006 | 0 |
| 17 | 2026 | 0 |
About Menna Brown
Menna Brown is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Social Media in Health Education (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (134 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations), General Health Professions (91 citations) and Health (19 citations). Menna Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ann John, Alice E. Hoon, A. Glendenning, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Matt Jones, Hugo van Woerden, Philip Tucker, Anna Dahlgren, Gwyneth Davies and Hayley Hutchings. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Quality & Safety, JMIR Mental Health, Academic Psychiatry and The Clinical Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.