Meghan O’Connell

37 papers receiving 988 citations

Peers

Meghan O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 344
  • Pharmacy 48
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Speech and Hearing 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
Replace Apolinaras Zaborskis with:
Apolinaras Zaborskis Lithuania
Lesley Cottrell United States
Parisa Amiri Iran
Meghan Finch Australia
Kate Bartlem Australia
Giacomo Lazzeri Italy
Lucia Magee United Kingdom
Lisa Kakinami Canada
Miranda Pallan United Kingdom
Monica Hunsberger Sweden
Meghan O’Connell relative to Apolinaras Zaborskis Lithuania Apolinaras Zaborskis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Apolinaras Zaborskis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meghan O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan O’Connell. The network helps show where Meghan O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meghan O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meghan O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Meghan O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005382
2 201598
3 201277
4 201166
5 201263
6 202150
7 201845
8 201534
9 201430
10 201726
11 200424
12 202021
13 200417
14 202017
15 201514
16 201314
17 202010
18 202210
19 202010
20 20037

About Meghan O’Connell

Meghan O’Connell is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Speech and Hearing and General Health Professions, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (344 citations), Pharmacy (48 citations), General Health Professions (205 citations), Speech and Hearing (52 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations). Meghan O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn E. Henderson, Marlene B. Schwartz, David L. Katz, Ming‐Chin Yeh, Haq Nawaz, Stella Cory, Laurie Anderson, William H. Dietz, Valentine Njike and Dedra Buchwald. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Sleep Medicine, Childhood Obesity, JAMA Network Open, American Journal of Health Promotion and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact